As someone who is from outside the industry and who espouses the virtues of this course, I believe that EVERYONE should be able to read or write DNA, it's should be the most accessible technology similar to using a computer. Editing is a another topic.
Australia, it's a similar culturally and practically, though there are some differences, there’s ,pre focus in terms of coordinating the opportunities from a whole country perspective. And the Gene regulators are more open to synthetic biology approaches than some jurisdictions in the States.
Bioscarers are people who fearmonger about the impacts of using biotechnology. Its interesting because some of the challenges faced ethically and morally for scientists can be framed using this mechanism as a way to canvas ideas and worries that bio-scarers and their platforms profess. It’s also important to contextualise their viewpoints from the perspective of the broader society because we share our society together, however it’s also obtrusive if the opinions are uninformed and lack the understanding of the beneficial implications of using biotechnology.
I'm always intrigued by how varied biology can be, given different evolutionary conditions. For me one interesting product are those electricity producing bacteria. Could you turn them into switches for sensing purposes. What would that sensor look like at scale and its applications?
Definitely 3FGC, bioluminescent walls forever!!